Archive for August, 2009
Catching Up With Lavell Edwards
Friday, August 7th, 2009Healthcare and faith: Can we afford to be our brothers keeper?
Tuesday, August 4th, 2009From Examiner.com
Unless you have the good fortune to be on another planet you have no doubt heard nothing but news of the health care debate for the past several weeks. One side says that the Obama plan will bankrupt this country and send us all to the poor house, the other side says we must insure the millions of people who have no health care coverage and we can do this by increasing the tax burden on the wealthiest of our citizens and as of this date, Tim (Turbo Tax ) Geithner, the Treasury Secretary , has come out and said that we may have raise taxes to pay for this behemoth of a program. So much for the “95 percent of you will get a tax cut” pledge.
This should come as no surprise to anyone who has a rudimentary grasp of mathematics. This plan by the government’s own estimates will cost TRILLIONS of dollars. Had you ever heard of a “trillion” previous to the last four or five years? What comes after that, a gazillion? Any time you hear someone from the government start throwing out numbers, run them on your own. Two things will usually be obvious. First, the numbers are usually wrong. Second, if you analyze any government program that has been in place for a few years, look at what the initial estimated cost was going to be, and look at the actual cost. Most of the time it is grossly underestimated. Then we have politicians who stand up and say to us that we must spend or go bankrupt. Just how does that work? Not well for the average citizen who doesn’t have a few trillion laying around in a savings account.
In an article done for the Memphis Medical News, Holli W. Haynie states that according to 2005 data approximately 10% of the population of Shelby county is uninsured. This equates to about 90,000 people without health care coverage. These people often wind up going to emergency rooms to be treated for what is in essence a chronic condition. This ties up emergency centers and hinders them from treating real life threatening events
Putting aside the debate from a political perspective, how are people of faith expected to deal with this issue? Most faith traditions have admonitions about caring for the sick and elderly. Proverbs 29:7 (New International Version)7 The righteous care about justice for the poor, but the wicked have no such concern. Leviticus 23:22 (New International Version)
22 ” ‘When you reap the harvest of your land, do not reap to the very edges of your field or gather the gleanings of your harvest. Leave them for the poor and the alien. I am the LORD your God.’ ” The Holy Quran says: # 2:184 (Asad) [fasting] during a certain number of days. [155] But whoever of you is ill, or on a journey, [shall fast instead for the same] number of other days; and [in such cases] it is incumbent upon those who can afford it to make sacrifice by feeding a needy person. The Book of Mormon: Alma 34
1. [28] And now behold, my beloved brethren, I say unto you, do not suppose that this is all; for after ye have done all these things, if ye turn away the needy, and the naked, and visit not the sick and afflicted, and impart of your substance, if ye have, to those who stand in need — I say unto you, if ye do not any of these things, behold, your prayer is vain, and availeth you nothing, and ye are as hypocrites who do deny the faith.
As can be seen we as people of faith are expected to care for those who cannot care for themselves. Most of us don’t have a problem with this and would gladly help those who are genuinely in need, but how many of the millions that the government claims are uninsured are actually in that category? Once you extrapolate those who are uninsured for other reasons such as young people who feel like they are not in need of insurance right now, wealthy people who can afford to pay their medical bills themselves, people who have savings accounts set up for medical emergencies, and so forth, just how many people are not covered because they cannot afford to pay for it?
Cont.
Volunteering is on the rise–Utah Tops the List
Monday, August 3rd, 2009From Omaha.com

Any volunteers?
Yes, even in a sour economy, says a federal agency that studies volunteerism.
The number of Americans giving away their time and talent rose last year — defying the typical pattern of a recession — and Nebraska again ranked No. 2 among states, the Corporation for National and Community Service reported this week.
Kelsi Cummings, a 16-year-old junior at Westside High School, didn’t take time to digest that news. She was too busy helping 11 pre-kindergarteners at a summer camp in downtown Omaha’s Children’s Museum.
“We learned the letters L through P and the numbers 5 and 6,” she said.
Cummings is one of about 40 volunteers, from teens to retirees, who work at the museum, doing everything from guiding visitors to setting up the hands-on exhibits, said Jan McKenzie, the staff member who organizes them. With kids out of school and tourists passing through town, “summer is our busiest season,” she said.
The museum is but one in a nationwide web of enterprises — food banks, churches, baseball leagues, art galleries, fire brigades, book clubs — that wouldn’t function without volunteers, that wouldn’t provide what French thinker Alexis de Tocqueville proclaimed the energetic drive of a young America.
Almost a million more people donated their time in 2008 than in 2007, said the Corporation for National and Community Service, which measures volunteerism annually using census data and its own polling. It said:
— In all, 61.8 million people — 27 percent of the U.S. population — volunteered last year, the largest number since 2005.
— In Nebraska, the volunteer rate — the portion of residents who donated time — was just under 39 percent, which ranked the state behind only Utah’s 43.5 percent.
— Iowa’s rate was 37 percent, which moved it to No. 5 among states, up from No. 6 last year.
— Within Nebraska, surburbanites had the highest rate of volunteering, 43 percent, closely followed by rural residents’ 42 percent. Urbanites had a 30 percent rate.
“It is wonderful that Nebraska continues to have one the nation’s highest volunteerism rates. This is one of the many areas where our state stands out,” Gov. Dave Heineman said of the findings.
The stability of Nebraska’s ranking — in second spot four years running — is striking, said Greg Donovan, program officer for ServeNebraska, a state agency that promotes and coordinates volunteer efforts.
“One of the things that has struck me,” Donovan said, is that “in rural areas and small towns, if something is not done by volunteers, it’s not done at all.” Moreover, he said, residents there view this as a fact of life, “not anything special.”
This phenomenon may have helped cement Nebraska’s ranking, he said, because the corporation recently has adjusted its polling to question people more closely about informal help they might not even think of as volunteer work.
“Neighborliness comes through better now,” he said.
As for Utah’s top ranking, Donovan said, “the Mormon Church does a great job” of mobilizing volunteers. It’s dominant influence makes the state “a bit of an outlier” in the statistics.
The corporation’s researchers also broke down the volunteerism figures for 50 large cities and 75 midsize ones, which are detailed on its Web site, www.volunteeringinamerica.gov.
In the latter group, Omaha tied with Toledo, Ohio, at No. 20, with a volunteer rate of 34.8 percent. That was down slightly from Omaha’s No. 18 ranking at 35.8 percent the previous year.
“I think it certainly reflects the spirit of the city,” said Ron Gerard, a spokesman for Mayor Jim Suttle. “… I think we need to get the word out to the rest of the country.”
A volunteer clearinghouse that United Way of the Midlands operates in Omaha, matching would-be helpers with whoever needs them, “has been as busy or busier than ever” recently, said spokeswoman Kathy O’Hara.
“It just seems like people pull together,” she said, suggesting that economic strain has encouraged rather than depressed volunteerism.
Another factor, perhaps, she said: “Some people say that if you’ve got less money to give, you give time.”
In fact, last month first lady Michelle Obama launched an initiative called United We Serve, urgingAmericans to help the nation’s economic recovery by volunteering at schools, hospitals and other community organizations.
The absolute worst lie
Monday, August 3rd, 2009
Don’t let them get away with saying people of faith abandon kids
One of abortion advocates’ most offensive arguments is that pro-life supporters “don’t care about children after they’re born.”
Indeed, pro-choice propaganda on choicematters.org essentially says that the term “pro life” is a ruse — that those who are pro-life aren’t really; they’re really just anti-abortion.
“The ‘pro-life’ concerns of abortion foes are only for fetal lives, not the lives of women or unwanted babies,” the propaganda says.
It’s one of the most foul, vile and disingenuous lies you’ll ever run into.
Religious people have, forever, built and supported orphanages, adopted other people’s children, started and supported charities that care for children — and have even traveled to other countries on a regular basis to help the poorest of the poor care for their children.
As The Chronicle’s Kelly Jasper reported on Sunday, the Mormon church runs one of the world’s largest private adoption agencies and in 1899, the Catholic Home Bureau became the first agency in the country to place children in homes rather than orphanages.
That’s just a couple of examples of how people of faith put their beliefs into action.
Often, adoptive parents aren’t doing it because they can’t have children of their own, for they do. They just want to spread the love around.
They do often at great cost. An adoption can cost up to $30,000. Former Augustan Dee Thompson took out a loan to adopt one child, then cashed out her 401(k) to adopt a second.
Don’t let anyone ever suggest to you that people of faith don’t care about children.
Poll: Mormons most likely to be offended by Hollywood
Sunday, August 2nd, 2009
The survey showed more than two-thirds of Mormons (68%) rebuffed the entertainment industry, followed by 54% of Jehovah’s Witnesses and 53% of evangelicals. Less than half (42%) of the general population said Hollywood threatens their values.
In contrast, majorities of all other major religions disagreed that stars and the silver screen are a moral threat.
The study did not delve into causes for the negative perception, but solid majorities of Mormons surveyed are conservative (60%) and 88% believe in absolute standards of right and wrong.
Adherents to the Mormon faith also showed “exceptionally high levels of religious commitment,” according to the Pew study.
On the small and big screens, a few notable actors have appeared in recent years with Mormon roots; among them, Katherine Heigl, Aaron Eckhart, Rick Schroder, Jon Heder and Amy Adams.
Incidentally, California is not just home to Tinseltown; it also boasts America’s second-largest Mormon population (13%), second only to Utah (35%). Mormons account for 1.7% of American adults, comparable to the nation’s Jewish population.
The current survey was released Friday to coincide with Pioneer Day, a state holiday in Utah, which commemorates the arrival in 1847 of the first Mormon settlers in Salt Lake Valley.
.jpg)


