David (Archuleta) vs. Goliath (Bob Dylan): Xmas edition

October 18th, 2009

From The New York Post:

For the first and probably only time in history, Bob Dylan, the freewheelin’ 68-year-old rock legend, and David Archuleta, the lucky troll-like 18-year-old “American Idol” runner-up, are on the same artistic plane. On Wednesday, Dylan released “Christmas in the Heart,” while Archuleta issued “Christmas From the Heart” last Friday.

Dylan’s Tom Waits-like gargle on “Winter Wonderland” and haunting growl on “Here Comes Santa Claus” sound like your egg nog-steeped pervy uncle. Archuleta’s gentle whisper on “Silent Night” could easily be mistaken for Cindy Lou Who. But ages, tastes, fashion senses, political views and religious affiliations (Dave’s a Mormon, Bob’s a Jew who later got Born Again) aside, who is more full of Christmas spirit? The Post breaks it down.

SONGS THEY BOTH SING
“The First Noel”

Dylan: leans heavily on lady backup singers imported from 1956.
Archuleta: sings sweet harmonies with himself, satisfying many a tween fantasy.
Advantage: Archuleta

“O Come All Ye Faithful”
Dylan:
sings “joyful and trah-UMPH-unt” in an inexplicable Southern drawl.
Archuleta: makes vocal flourishes that go up and down more than the elevators where this song will play.
Advantage: Even

“Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas”
Dylan:
is like your gramps in the lovey-dovey stage of inebriation, right before he breaks out Korean War horror stories.
Archuleta: pairs with Filipina singing sensation Charice Pempengco. Can’t tell who’s who. Advantage: Dylan

LATIN SKILLZ
Dylan:
sings first verse of “O Come All Ye Faithful” in Latin (“Adeste fidelas . . .”).
Archuleta: sings “Ave Maria” (some Latin), “Angels We Have Heard on High” (refrain: “Gloria in excelsis Deo”).
Advantage: Archuleta

ELF POWER
Dylan:
has trouble growing facial hair, is 5-foot-7 and fond of pointy shoes.
Archuleta: has trouble growing facial hair, is 5-foot-8 and likes pointy hats (or is that his hair?)
Advantage: Dylan

EXTRA CREDIT
Dylan: is donating US proceeds from the record to charity Feed America. He produced this album, plus two earlier records, under the pseudonym Jack Frost.
Archuleta: sings Spanish hymn “Riu Riu Chiu” flawlessly. His unwavering smooth-jazz vibe is engineered to never offend anyone.
Advantage: Dylan

WHO MAKES SANTA’S LIST?
Sorry, boys, lumps of coal for you both. David, you’re too syrupy. And, Bob, your sleigh bells scare us

Elder Dallin H. Oaks: Religious Freedom At Risk (Full Interview) 10/13/09

October 18th, 2009

Catching Up With Lavell Edwards

August 7th, 2009

Healthcare and faith: Can we afford to be our brothers keeper?

August 4th, 2009

From Examiner.com

Unless you have the good fortune to be on another planet you have no doubt heard nothing but news of the health care debate for the past several weeks. One side says that the    Obama plan will bankrupt this country and send us all to the poor house, the other side says we must insure the millions of people who have no health care coverage and we can do this by increasing the tax burden on the wealthiest of our citizens and as of this date,  Tim (Turbo Tax ) Geithner,  the Treasury Secretary , has come out and said that we may have raise taxes to pay for this behemoth of a program. So much for the “95 percent of you will get a tax cut” pledge.

This should come as no surprise to anyone who has a rudimentary grasp of mathematics. This plan by the government’s own estimates will cost TRILLIONS of dollars. Had you ever heard of a “trillion” previous to the last four or five years? What comes after that, a gazillion?  Any time you hear someone from the government start throwing out numbers, run them on your own.  Two things will usually be obvious. First, the numbers are usually wrong. Second, if you analyze any government program that has been in place for a  few years, look at what the initial estimated cost was going to be, and look at the actual cost. Most of the time it is grossly underestimated.  Then we have politicians who stand up and say to us that we must spend or go bankrupt. Just how does that work?  Not well for the average citizen who doesn’t have a few trillion laying around in a savings account.

In an article done for the Memphis Medical News, Holli W. Haynie states that according to 2005 data approximately 10% of the population of Shelby county is uninsured. This equates to about 90,000 people without health care coverage. These people often wind up going to emergency rooms to be treated for what is in essence a chronic condition. This ties up emergency centers and hinders them from treating real life threatening events

Putting aside the debate from a political perspective, how are people of faith expected to deal with this issue? Most faith traditions have admonitions about caring for the sick and elderly.  Proverbs 29:7 (New International Version)7 The righteous care about justice for the poor, but the wicked have no such concern.  Leviticus 23:22 (New International Version)
22 ” ‘When you reap the harvest of your land, do not reap to the very edges of your field or gather the gleanings of your harvest. Leave them for the poor and the alien. I am the LORD your God.’ ” The Holy Quran says:  # 2:184 (Asad) [fasting] during a certain number of days. [155] But whoever of you is ill, or on a journey, [shall fast instead for the same] number of other days; and [in such cases] it is incumbent upon those who can afford it to make sacrifice by feeding a needy person. The Book of Mormon: Alma 34
1. [28] And now behold, my beloved brethren, I say unto you, do not suppose that this is all; for after ye have done all these things, if ye turn away the needy, and the naked, and visit not the sick and afflicted, and impart of your substance, if ye have, to those who stand in need — I say unto you, if ye do not any of these things, behold, your prayer is vain, and availeth you nothing, and ye are as hypocrites who do deny the faith.

As can be seen we as people of faith are expected to care for those who cannot care for themselves.  Most of us don’t have a problem with this and would gladly help those who are genuinely in need, but how many of the millions that the government claims are uninsured are actually in  that category?  Once you extrapolate those who are uninsured for other reasons such as young people who feel like they are not in need of insurance right now, wealthy people who can afford to pay their medical bills themselves, people who have savings accounts set up for medical emergencies, and so forth, just how many people are not covered because they cannot afford to pay for it?

Cont.

Volunteering is on the rise–Utah Tops the List

August 3rd, 2009

From Omaha.com

Any volunteers?

Yes, even in a sour economy, says a federal agency that studies volunteerism.

The number of Americans giving away their time and talent rose last year — defying the typical pattern of a recession — and Nebraska again ranked No. 2 among states, the Corporation for National and Community Service reported this week.

Kelsi Cummings, a 16-year-old junior at Westside High School, didn’t take time to digest that news. She was too busy helping 11 pre-kindergarteners at a summer camp in downtown Omaha’s Children’s Museum.

“We learned the letters L through P and the numbers 5 and 6,” she said.

Cummings is one of about 40 volunteers, from teens to retirees, who work at the museum, doing everything from guiding visitors to setting up the hands-on exhibits, said Jan McKenzie, the staff member who organizes them. With kids out of school and tourists passing through town, “summer is our busiest season,” she said.

The museum is but one in a nationwide web of enterprises — food banks, churches, baseball leagues, art galleries, fire brigades, book clubs — that wouldn’t function without volunteers, that wouldn’t provide what French thinker Alexis de Tocqueville proclaimed the energetic drive of a young America.

Almost a million more people donated their time in 2008 than in 2007, said the Corporation for National and Community Service, which measures volunteerism annually using census data and its own polling. It said:

— In all, 61.8 million people — 27 percent of the U.S. population — volunteered last year, the largest number since 2005.

— In Nebraska, the volunteer rate — the portion of residents who donated time — was just under 39 percent, which ranked the state behind only Utah’s 43.5 percent.

— Iowa’s rate was 37 percent, which moved it to No. 5 among states, up from No. 6 last year.

— Within Nebraska, surburbanites had the highest rate of volunteering, 43 percent, closely followed by rural residents’ 42 percent. Urbanites had a 30 percent rate.

“It is wonderful that Nebraska continues to have one the nation’s highest volunteerism rates. This is one of the many areas where our state stands out,” Gov. Dave Heineman said of the findings.

The stability of Nebraska’s ranking — in second spot four years running — is striking, said Greg Donovan, program officer for ServeNebraska, a state agency that promotes and coordinates volunteer efforts.

“One of the things that has struck me,” Donovan said, is that “in rural areas and small towns, if something is not done by volunteers, it’s not done at all.” Moreover, he said, residents there view this as a fact of life, “not anything special.”

This phenomenon may have helped cement Nebraska’s ranking, he said, because the corporation recently has adjusted its polling to question people more closely about informal help they might not even think of as volunteer work.

“Neighborliness comes through better now,” he said.

As for Utah’s top ranking, Donovan said, “the Mormon Church does a great job” of mobilizing volunteers. It’s dominant influence makes the state “a bit of an outlier” in the statistics.

The corporation’s researchers also broke down the volunteerism figures for 50 large cities and 75 midsize ones, which are detailed on its Web site, www.volunteeringinamerica.gov.

In the latter group, Omaha tied with Toledo, Ohio, at No. 20, with a volunteer rate of 34.8 percent. That was down slightly from Omaha’s No. 18 ranking at 35.8 percent the previous year.

“I think it certainly reflects the spirit of the city,” said Ron Gerard, a spokesman for Mayor Jim Suttle. “… I think we need to get the word out to the rest of the country.”

A volunteer clearinghouse that United Way of the Midlands operates in Omaha, matching would-be helpers with whoever needs them, “has been as busy or busier than ever” recently, said spokeswoman Kathy O’Hara.

“It just seems like people pull together,” she said, suggesting that economic strain has encouraged rather than depressed volunteerism.

Another factor, perhaps, she said: “Some people say that if you’ve got less money to give, you give time.”

In fact, last month first lady Michelle Obama launched an initiative called United We Serve, urgingAmericans to help the nation’s economic recovery by volunteering at schools, hospitals and other community organizations.

The absolute worst lie

August 3rd, 2009

From The AugustaChronicle.com

Don’t let them get away with saying people of faith abandon kids

One of abortion advocates’ most offensive arguments is that pro-life supporters “don’t care about children after they’re born.”

Indeed, pro-choice propaganda on choicematters.org essentially says that the term “pro life” is a ruse — that those who are pro-life aren’t really; they’re really just anti-abortion.

“The ‘pro-life’ concerns of abortion foes are only for fetal lives, not the lives of women or unwanted babies,” the propaganda says.

It’s one of the most foul, vile and disingenuous lies you’ll ever run into.

Religious people have, forever, built and supported orphanages, adopted other people’s children, started and supported charities that care for children — and have even traveled to other countries on a regular basis to help the poorest of the poor care for their children.

As The Chronicle’s Kelly Jasper reported on Sunday, the Mormon church runs one of the world’s largest private adoption agencies and in 1899, the Catholic Home Bureau became the first agency in the country to place children in homes rather than orphanages.

That’s just a couple of examples of how people of faith put their beliefs into action.

Often, adoptive parents aren’t doing it because they can’t have children of their own, for they do. They just want to spread the love around.

They do often at great cost. An adoption can cost up to $30,000. Former Augustan Dee Thompson took out a loan to adopt one child, then cashed out her 401(k) to adopt a second.

Don’t let anyone ever suggest to you that people of faith don’t care about children.

Joseph Smith’s letter of appeal to the Green Mountain Boys of Vermont

August 2nd, 2009

From Examiner.com

Old letters and articles from historic newspapers can help build depth when writing a family history. By including timely, historical events in your records the reader can wonder how those events impacted the lives of their ancestral families.

After the Mormons [members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints] left New York State in the mid 1800s, they continued west into Ohio and Missouri.  !– /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:”"; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:none; mso-layout-grid-align:none; text-autospace:none; font-size:12.0pt; mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt; font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”;} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} –>

Here, they were heavily persecuted. Missourians were especially brutal to the members—beating, terrorizing and driving the Saints from their homes. In 1838 an extermination order was issued by Missouri Governor, Lilburn Boggs. Part of the order read, „the Mormons must be treated as enemies, and must be exterminated or driven from the State if necessary for the public peace—their outrages are beyond all description.” The small, fledgling church continued westward into Illinois. It was in Nauvoo, a city built by the Saints along the Mississippi River that Joseph Smith sent a letter to the Green Mountain Boys of Vermont asking them to come to the Church’s aid. He hoped the results of the letter would be to help bring justice against the State of Missouri for the wrongs Missourians had committed against the Saints.

The letter was printed in the Warsaw Message, an Illinois newspaper:

Volume I- Number 44  January 17, 1844.

General Joseph Smith’s Appeal to the Green Mountain Boys.

I was born in Sharon, Vermont, in 1805, — where the first quarter of my life grew with the growth & strengthened with the strength of that “first-born” State of the “United Thirteen.” From the old “French War” to the final consummation of American Independence, my fathers, heart to heart, and shoulder to shoulder, with the noble fathers of our liberty, fought and bled; and with the most of that venerable band of patriots, they have gone to rest, — bequeathing a glorious country, with all her inherent rights, to millions of posterity. Like other honest citizens, I not only (when manhood came,) sought my own peace, prosperity, and happiness, but also the peace, prosperity, and happiness of my friends; and, with all the rights and realm before me, and the revelations of Jesus Christ to guide me into all truth, I had good reasons to enter into the blessings and privileges of an American citizen; — the rights of a Green Mountain Boy, unmolested, and enjoy life and religion according to the most virtuous and enlightened customs, rules, and etiquette of the nineteenth century. But, to the disgrace of the United States, it is not so. These rights and privileges, together with a large amount of property, have been wrested from me, and thousands of my friends, by lawless mobs in Missouri, supported by Executive authority; and the crime of plundering our property; and the unconstitutional and barbarous act of our expulsion; and even the inhumanity of murdering men, women, and children, have received the pass word of “justifiable” by legislative enactments, and the horrid deeds, doleful and disgraceful as they are, have been paid for by government.

In vain have we sought for redress of grievances and a restoration to our rights in the Courts and Legislature of Missouri. In vain have we sought for our rights and the remuneration for our property in the Halls of Congress, and at the hands of the President. The only consolation yet experienced from these highest tribunals and mercy seats of our bleeding country is, that our cause is just, but the government has no power to redress us.

Our arms were forcibly taken from us by those Missouri marauders; and, in spite of every effort to have them returned, the State of Missouri still retains them; and the United States militia law, with this fact before the government, still compels us to military duty; and, for a lack of said arms, the law forces us to pay fines. As Shakespeare would say; “thereby hangs a tale.”

Several hundred thousand dollars worth of land in Missouri was purchased at the U.S. Land Offices in that district of country: and the money without doubt, has been appropriated to strengthen the army and navy, or increase the power and glory of the nation in some other way; and notwithstanding Missouri has robbed and mobbed me and twelve or fifteen thousand innocent inhabitants murdered, and hundreds expelled, the residue, at the point of the bayonet, without law, contrary to the express language of the Constitution of the United States, and every State in the Union; and contrary to the custom and usage of civilized nations; and especially one holding up the motto: “The asylum of the oppressed;” yet the comfort we receive to raise our wounded bodies, and invigorate our troubled spirits, on account of such immense sacrifices of life, property, patience, and right; and as an equivalent for the enormous taxes we are compelled to pay to support the functionaries in a dignified manner, after we have petitioned and pleaded with tears and been showed like a caravan of foreign animals for the peculiar gratification of connoisseurs in humanity, that flare along in public life, like lamps upon lamp-posts, because they are better calculated for the schemes of the night than for the scenes of the day, is as President Van Buren said, your cause is just, but the government has no power to redress you!

No wonder, after the Pharisee’s prayer, the Publican smote his breast and said, Lord be merciful to me a sinner! What must the manacled nations think of freemen’s rights in the land of liberty?

Were I a Chaldean I would exclaim: Keed’ nauh to-maroon lehoam elauhayaugh deyshemayaugh veh aur kau lau gnaubadoo, yabadoo ma-ar’guauoomen tehoat shemayaugh alah. (Thus shall we say unto them: The gods that have not made the heavens and the earth, they shall perish from the earth, and from under these heavens.)

An Egyptian: Sa e eh-ni: (What other persons are these?) A Grecian: Diabolas basseleuei: (The Devil reigns.) A Frenchman: Messieurs sans Dieu, (Gentkemen without Go.) A Turk: Ain shems: (The fountain of light.) A german: sie sind unferstandig. (What consumate ignorance!) A Syrian: Zaubok. (Sacrifice!) A Spaniard: Il sabio muda conscio, il nescio ne. (A wise man reflects, a fool does not.) A Samaritian: Saunau! (O Stranger!) An Italian: O tempa! oh diffidanza! (O the times! O the diffidence!) A Hebrew: Ajtaij aol raicu (Thou God seest me.) A Dane: Hvnd tidende! (What tidings!) A Saxon: Hwaet riht! (What right!) A Swede: Hvad skilla: (What skill!) A Polander: Nav-yen-wheo bah poa na Jesus Christus: (Blessed be the name of Jesus Christ.) A Western Indian: She-mo-kah She-mo keh ough-nepgab. (The white man, O the white man, he very uncertain.) A Roman: Procul, o procul este profani! (Be off, be off ye profane!) But as I am I will only add: when the wicked rule the people mourn.

Now, therefore, having failed in every attempt to obtain satisfaction at the tribunals where all men seek for it, according to the rules of right: — I am compelled to appeal to the honor and patriotism of my native State: to the clemency and valor of “Green Mountain Boys;” for, throughout the various periods of the world, whenever a nation, kingdom, state, family, or individual has received an insult or an injury from a superior force, (unless satisfaction was made,) it has been the custom to call in the aid of friends to assist in obtaining redress. For proof we have only to refer to the recovery of Lot and his effects by Abraham, in the days of Sodom and Gomorrah; or to turn to the relief afforded by France and Holland for the achievement of the independence of these United States. Without bringing up the great bulk of historical facts, rules, laws, decrees, and treaties, and bible records, by which nations have been governed, to show that mutual alliance for the general benefit of mankind, to retaliate and repel foreign aggressions; to punish and prevent home wrongs, when the conservators of justice and the laws have failed to afford a remedy, are not only common and in the highest sense justifiable and wise, but they are also poorer expedients to promote the enjoyment of equal rights, the pursuit of happiness, the preservation of life, and the benefit of posterity.

With all these facts before me, and a pure desire to ameliorate the condition of the poor and unfortunate among men, and, if possible, to entice all men from evil to good, and with firm reliance that God will reward the just, I have been stimulated to call upon my native State, for a “union of all honest men;” and to appeal to the valor of the “Green Mountain Boys” by all honorable methods & means to assist me in obtaining justice from Missouri: not only for the property she has stolen and confiscated, the murders she has committed among my friends, and for our expulsion from the State, but also to humble and chastise, or abase her for the disgrace she has brought upon constitutional liberty, until she atones for her sins.

I appeal also to the fraternity of brethren, who are bound by kindred ties, to assist a brother in distress, in all cases where it can be done according to the rules of order, to extend the boon of benevolence and protection, in avenging the Lord of his enemies, as if a Solomon, a Hiram, a St. John, or a Washington raised his hands before a wondering world, and exclaimed: — “My life for his!” Light, liberty, and virtue forever!

I bring this appeal before my native State, for the solemn reason that an injury has been done, and crimes have been committed, which a sovereign State, of the Federal compact, one of the great family of “E pluribus unum,” refuses to compensate, by consent of parties, rules of law, customs of nations, or in any other way. I bring it also, because the national Government has fallen short of affording the necessary relief as before stated, for want of power, leaving a large body of her own free citizens, whose wealth went freely into her treasury for lands, and whose gold and silver for taxes, still fills the pockets of her dignitaries “in ermine and lace,” defrauded, robbed, moved, plundered, ravished, driven, exiled, and banished from the “Independent Republic of Missouri!”

And in the appeal let me say; raise your towers, pile your monuments to the skies; build your steam frigates; spread yourselves far and wide, and open the iron eyes of your bulwarks by sea and land; and let the towering church steeples marshal the country like the “dreadful splendor” of an army with bayonets: but remember the destruction of Pharaoh and his hosts; remember the handwriting upon the wall, mene, mene, teke, upharsin; remember the angels visit to Sennacherib and the 185,000 Assyrians; remember the end of the Jews and Jerusalem, and remember the Lord Almighty will avenge the blood of his Saints that now crimsons the skirts of Missouri! Shall wisdom cry aloud, and her speech not be heard?

Has the majesty of American liberty sunk into such vile servitude and oppression, that justice has fled? Have the glory and influence of a Washington, an Adams, a Jefferson, a Lafayette, and a host of others, forever departed, — and the wrath of a Cain, a Judas, and a Nero whirled forth in the heraldry of hell, to sprinkle our garments with blood; and lighten the darkness of midnight with the blaze of our dwellings? Where is the patriotism of ‘76? Where is the virtue of our forefathers? and where is the sacred honor of freemen?

Must we, because we believe in the fulness of the Gospel of Jesus Christ; the administration of angels, and the communion of the Holy Ghost, like the prophets and apostles of old, — must we be mobbed with impunity — be exiled from our habitations and property without remedy; murdered without mercy, — and government find the weapons, and pay the vagabonds for doing the jobs, and give them the plunder into the bargain? Must we, because we believe in enjoying the constitutional privilege and right of worshiping Almighty God according to the dictates of our own consciences; and because we believe in repentance, and baptism for the remission of sins; the gift of the Holy Ghost by the laying on of hands; the resurrection of the dead; the millennium; the day of judgment; and the Book of Mormon as the history of the aborigines of this continent, — must we be expelled from the institutions of our country, the rights of citizenship, and the graves of our friends and brethren, and the government lock the gate of humanity, and shut the door of redress against us? — If so, farewell freedom; adieu to personal safety, and let the red hot wrath of an offended God purify the nation of such sinks of corruption! For that realm is hurrying to ruin where vice has the power to expel virtue.

My Father, who stood several times in the battles of the American Revolution, till his companions in arms, had been shot dead, at his feet, was forced from his home in Far West, Missouri, by those civilized, or satanized savages, in the dreary season of winter, to seek a shelter in another State; and the vicissitudes and sufferings consequent to his flight brought his honored grey head to the grave, a few months after. And my youngest brother also, in the vigor and bloom of youth, from his great exposure and fatigue in endeavoring to assist his parents on their journey, (I and my brother Hyrum being in chains, in dungeons — where they tried to feed us on human flesh — in Missouri,) was likewise so debilitated that he found a premature grave shortly after my father. And my mother, too, though she yet lingers among us, from her extreme exposure in that dreadful tragedy, was filled with rheumatic affections and other diseases, which leave her no enjoyment of health. She is sinking in grief and pain, broken-hearted, from Missouri persecution.

O death! wilt thou not give to every honest man, a heated dart to sting those wretches while they pollute the land? and O grave! wilt thou not open the trap door to the pit of ungodly men, that they may stumble in?

I appeal to the Green Mountain Boys of my native State, to rise in the majesty of virtuous freemen, and by all honorable means help bring Missouri to the bar of justice. If there is one whisper from the spirit of an Ethen Allen, or a gleam from the shade of a Gen. Stark, let it mingle with our sense of honor and fire our bosoms for the cause of suffering innocence, — for the reputation of our disgraced country, and for the glory of God; and may all the earth bear me witness, if Missouri, blood-stained Missouri, — escapes the due merit of her crimes, the vengeance she so justly deserves — that Vermont is a hypocrite — a coward — and this nation the hot bed of political demagogues!

I make this appeal to the sons of liberty of my native State for help to frustrate the wicked design of sinful men; I make it to hush the violence of mobs; I make it to cope with the unhallowed influence of wicked men in high places; I make it to resent the insult and injury made to an innocent, unoffending people, by a lawless ruffian State; I make it to show our nation’s escutcheon; I make it to show presidents, governors, and rulers, prudence; I make it to fill honorable men with discretion; I make it to teach senators wisdom; I make it to learn judges justice; I make it to point clergymen to the path of virtue; and I make it to turn the hearts of this nation to the truth and realities of pure and undefiled religion, that they may escape the perdition of ungodly men; and Jesus Christ, the Son of God, is my Great Counsellor.

Wherefore let the rich and the learned, the wise and the noble, the poor and the needy; the bond and the free, both black and white, take heed to their ways, and cleave to the knowledge of God; and execute justice and judgment upon the earth in righteousness; and prepare to meet the judge of the quick and the dead, for the hour of his coming is nigh.

And I must go on as the herald of grace,
Till the wide-spreading conflict is over.
And burst thro’ the curtains of tyrannic night.
Yes, I must go on to gather our race,
Till the high blazing flames of Jehovah
Illumines the globe as a triumph of right.

As a friend of equal rights to all men, and a messenger of the everlasting gospel of Jesus Christ,

I have the honor to be,
Your devoted servant,
JOSEPH SMITH.

Nauvoo, Ill., Dec., 1843.

The letter was not received well and the Extermination Order stood until it was officially rescinded in 1976.

Poll: Mormons most likely to be offended by Hollywood

August 2nd, 2009

From USA Today

WASHINGTON — Mormons are the faith group most likely to say Hollywood threatens their values, followed by Jehovah’s Witnesses and evangelicals, according to a new study by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life.

The survey showed more than two-thirds of Mormons (68%) rebuffed the entertainment industry, followed by 54% of Jehovah’s Witnesses and 53% of evangelicals. Less than half (42%) of the general population said Hollywood threatens their values.

In contrast, majorities of all other major religions disagreed that stars and the silver screen are a moral threat.

The study did not delve into causes for the negative perception, but solid majorities of Mormons surveyed are conservative (60%) and 88% believe in absolute standards of right and wrong.

Adherents to the Mormon faith also showed “exceptionally high levels of religious commitment,” according to the Pew study.

On the small and big screens, a few notable actors have appeared in recent years with Mormon roots; among them, Katherine Heigl, Aaron Eckhart, Rick Schroder, Jon Heder and Amy Adams.

Incidentally, California is not just home to Tinseltown; it also boasts America’s second-largest Mormon population (13%), second only to Utah (35%). Mormons account for 1.7% of American adults, comparable to the nation’s Jewish population.

The current survey was released Friday to coincide with Pioneer Day, a state holiday in Utah, which commemorates the arrival in 1847 of the first Mormon settlers in Salt Lake Valley.

Missionary Sendoffs Altered for Swine Flu Precaution

June 4th, 2009

From Fox13now.com

San Francisco police arrest 175 anti-Prop 8 protesters

May 26th, 2009

From MercuryNews.com:

Though widely anticipated, the California Supreme Court’s decision today to uphold the November ballot measure that banned gay marriage induced anger, tears and vows to intensify the fight for equal rights for same-sex couples to marry.

Those who supported Proposition 8 at the ballot box hailed the ruling as a defense of traditional values, as did conservative politicians gearing up for next year’s battle to succeed Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.

But the most poignant reaction to the 6-1 ruling was among the gay community, where couples — married and not — saw the high court decision as a retreat from its ruling just a year ago that marriage was a fundamental right of all couples, regardless of sexual orientation.

“I’ve just been told that I have less equal rights than my colleagues,” said West Hollywood Councilman John Duran, who is gay. “Our right to freedom and equality is not up for a vote.”

His voice racked with emotion, Duran said he had expected Proposition 8 to be upheld, but that the reality of it still made him angry.

The justices seemed to signal consternation over the ruling, making it clear that it was a judgment on the narrow question of whether the ballot initiative legally amended the state Constitution and setting aside federal constitutional issues of equality under the law. They ruled that the 18,000 gay marriages conducted in the state last year during the six-month period that they were legal remained valid, but failed to make clear the status of gay couples legally married in other states and countries who make their home in California.

Bill Walker, 52, and Kelly Ziegler, 41, were married last June 17 in Los Angeles and stayed home from work in Hollywood today so they could be together when the ruling was announced.

“We grabbed each other’s hands when they said we were still married,” said Walker, a television writer. “We’re obviously happy that our marriage was upheld and that that can’t be taken away from us, but it’s a very compromised feeling because we have friends who can’t get married now.”

Chris Clarke, 39, of Fountain Valley voted for Proposition 8 in November because it stood for the “ideals of what I think raising a family should be in this country.”

Clarke, a lifeguard who was spending his day off with his wife and son at the Bella Terra mall, said the ruling reaffirmed that belief.

“It’s about raising kids, and ideally it’s about a kid being surrounded by a mom and a dad, and I say that recognizing that there are good gay parents and bad straight parents,” he said while his 1-year-old son played near a fountain.

Schwarzenegger said this morning that he would abide by the Supreme Court’s ruling backing Proposition 8 but that he believes gay couples should have the right to marry and would obtain it someday through an initiative or the courts.

“He voted no on Prop. 8. He supports the idea of giving same-sex couples the right to marry. I think he was hoping it would go the other way,” said spokesman Aaron McLear.

California Atty. Gen. Jerry Brown said he was surprised as well as disappointed, given the state Supreme Court’s ardent defense of equal rights for same-sex couples expressed a year ago.

“They’re saying it’s only a name . . . they said last time, it’s not just a name,” Brown said of the justices’ pronouncement on marriage. “I do think that is a retreat from their strong defense of the right of marriage that they found to exist within the California constitutional framework.”

San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom urged Californians to “reach out to those who still disagree with our position” to persuade them to understand the importance of equal treatment.

“Across the nation, states like Iowa, Connecticut and Massachusetts are recognizing that separate can never be equal under the eyes of the law,” Newsom said.

But his Republican opponent in the race for governor next year, retired EBay chief Meg Whitman, hailed the high court ruling as a validation of voters’ rights to decide the law.

“I believe the California State Supreme Court made the right decision. Last November, the people of California passed Proposition 8, and today the court upheld their decision,” Whitman said. “This simple yet powerful fact is the foundation of our democracy. Regardless of one’s position on the measure, this ruling gives people confidence that their vote matters and can make a difference.”

At a news conference in Sacramento, leaders of the Yes on 8 campaign, ProtectMarriage.com, applauded the ruling but said they would continue with multimillion-dollar public education and political action efforts in anticipation of a new campaign by the measure’s opponents to overturn it with another initiative.

Huntsman to China: Winners and Losers

May 19th, 2009

From The Washington Post:

The news that Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman will be the Obama administration’s envoy to China has myriad implications in terms of the re-building of the Republican Party and the positioning of potential candidates for 2012.

Huntsman had already begun to put in place the pieces of a national campaign — bringing on John Weaver, a former senior adviser to Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), and recruiting operatives in places like New Hampshire and South Carolina.

What that tells us is that while it may be only 2009, the process of running for president is already well under way on the Republican side. And, that means that the moderate Utah governor’s departure from the race creates opportunities — both ideologically and geographically — that those with national aspirations will move to fill.

Below is our list of the winners and losers from the Huntsman announcement. Have thoughts of your own? The comments section awaits.

WINNERS

Mitt Romney: The 2012 presidential field probably wasn’t big enough for two Mormon candidates. Huntsman’s presence in the race would have split the Mormon donor base on which Romney capitalized so successfully in 2008 and would also have kept the religion issue front and center (Two Mormons! Running for president!), which would not have worked in Romney’s favor. Romney is already at the front of the 2012 pack but Huntsman’s decision strengthens his hand.

Charlie Crist: If you believe the idea that there is a moderate/centrist slot in the 2012 presidential field, then the Florida governor is now the leading voice of that wing of the party. (Worth noting: Rudy Giuliani’s bet that there was a moderate track to the nomination in 2008 proved entirely didn’t pay.) Crist is the favorite to replace Sen. Mel Martinez (R) in the Senate next fall and, if he wins, will be able to point to his recent electoral successes as a validation of his pragmatic conservative approach. Of course, Crist is solely focused on serving in the Senate and isn’t running in this race with an eye on 2012. Riiiiiight.

Jon Huntsman: Yes, he voluntarily took himself out of the running for 2012. But, Huntsman, who is only 49 years old, may well have positioned himself perfectly for 2016 — if Obama wins a second term in three years time. Huntsman will have deepened his resume — several years working with the world’s biggest emerging superpower can’t hurt — and this move will enable him to make the argument that his life’s work has demonstrated the sort of bipartisan cooperation that voters profess to love. Could Huntsman’s work with a Democratic administration raise questions among hard-line conservatives about his Republican bona fides? Maybe. But, after eight years of a Democratic president the base would almost certainly be more focused on winning back the White House than proving an ideological point.

Bob Bennett: The Utah Republican senator seemed to be on a crash course with state Attorney General Mark Shurtleff in 2010. (Shurtleff all but announced his primary candidacy via an accidental tweet last week.) Now, there is a decent chance that Shurtleff decides to make a bid for the governorship in a 2010 special election although to do so would mean he would have to battle through a crowded primary that is almost certain to include Lt. Gov. Gary Herbert, who would replace Huntsman when he steps down. Utah insiders still believe Shurtleff will run for the Senate but a semi-open governor’s race might be too enticing for him to pass up.

LOSERS

Moderates: There are a small number of influential moderates within the party and their ranks have thinned in recent weeks with former Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge’s decision not to run for the Senate and Huntsman’s move to China. With the debate raging in the GOP over whether to re-shape the party’s image in a more centrist light or reaffirm core conservative principles, there aren’t many voices on the moderate side of the argument.

Former McCainiacs: A number of people with close ties to McCain’s two presidential bids — led by Weaver and South Carolina consultant Richard Quinn — had already signed on to help Huntsman in 2012. With their guy now off the presidential playing field indefinitely, they have to find a new rising star for 2012 or run the risk of being left out of the machinations over identity of the party’s next nominee.

Enviros: Huntsman was the most prominent voice among 2012 GOP contenders in support of curbing greenhouse gas emissions to lessen the dangers posed by global warming. With him out of the field, it’s not clear who — if anyone — will pick up that mantle on the Republican side. And, in Utah, Herbert is far less progressive on environmental issues than Huntsman — meaning the gains made by the environmental community in recent years in the state are in danger of being re-examined.

Mormon Church Goes Up in Flames

May 18th, 2009

From The Harvard Crimson:

Flames engulfed the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints off Brattle Street yesterday morning, evicting at least 500 people and reducing the building to a skeleton of walls, a dusty steeple, and a chasm of seared wood.

Churchgoers safely evacuated after a fire erupted in the attic of the church, which was built in the mid-1950s. The fire eventually collapsed into the interior of the building, issuing plumes of smoke that could be seen from Harvard Square.

“I was baptized here, met my husband here, and had his funeral here,” said service attendant Ruby I. Von Dwornick, her voice breaking as she stood before the remaining walls of the church. “It was heartbreaking to see it be destroyed.”

Fire departments from nearby towns joined the Cambridge Fire Department to fight the flames, which were quelled sometime after noon. The cause of the fire remains under investigation, but church members posited faulty wiring, antiquated electrical systems, and even lightning strikes as possibilities.

A structural engineer will inspect the church’s remains today to determine whether the building can be rebuilt or should be destroyed, according to Brad R. MacDonald, assistant to the president of the Cambridge stake, or administrative unit of the Mormon church. Ultimately, the church will likely rebuild in the same location, a process that could take at least a year and a half, MacDonald said.

Mormons from across Cambridge were gathered yesterday at the Cambridge church—one of the first Mormon churches established in Mass.—for a special service broadcast live from Salt Lake City. But at 10:37 a.m., shortly into the second sermon, fire alarms began to ring.

Attendants evacuated the chapel within minutes, though most did not take the alarm very seriously, according to congregation member Sean L. Little, who said he did not smell any smoke in the chapel at the time.

“We just thought someone pulled the alarm,” Little said. “But as we filed out of the doors, we saw the smoke coming out of the roof and realized it was real.”

Once outside, Dwornick said she noticed a gradually spreading “ball of flame creeping out from underneath the roof.” She said a firefighter eventually sawed a hole in the roof of the chapel, instigating an explosion of flame that travelled a third of the way up the steeple and engulfed the chapel in which she had been moments before.

“This is my home church, as far as I’m concerned,” Dwornick said. “I’m very grateful I got to attend church here the last day it stood.”

“It’s a very sad day,” said Gordon K. Low, president of the Cambridge stake, as he stood on the lawn in front of the smoldering building. “There are thousands of members of the church in New England whose experiences are here in this building.”

As firefighters continued to pour water into the charred interior of the church late yesterday afternoon to prevent possible flare-ups, church members lingered outside the building to share hugs and distribute bags of chips.

“It’s a big, robust church community here,” Low said. “We’ll rebuild and get this back to the point where we’re operating efficiently as a chapel.”

In an effort to salvage historical books left inside the destroyed church, some congregation members formed an assembly line to pass down books that survived the flames. A neighboring Quaker church and the repository at the Harvard Divinity School have offered to hold the items until the church finds a space of its own, MacDonald said.

Low expressed his gratitude to the multiple congregations for their gestures of consolation and aid. Members of the destroyed church will likely disperse to different Mormon churches in the area in future weeks.

But leaders of the church are confident that the destruction of the building is only a physical loss.

“It’s certainly devastating but I think the church is always prepared to rebuild and continue its mission,” MacDonald said. “We can always rebuild if we want to—in a metaphorical sense.”

Majority of Americans are Pro-Life

May 16th, 2009

From The LA Times:

At a time when President Obama is trying to convince opponents in the abortion battle that they can find middle ground — in rhetoric, if not reality — a new Gallup Poll shows that more Americans describe themselves as “pro-life” than “pro-choice.”

For the first time since it began asking the question in 1995, Gallup reported Friday, a majority of adults questioned for its annual survey on values and beliefs — 51% — said that when it comes to abortion, they consider themselves “pro-life”; 42% consider themselves “pro-choice.” (The margin of sampling error is plus or minus 3 percentage points.)

This represents a significant shift, Gallup noted. As recently as last year, 50% of respondents called themselves “pro-choice” and 44% identified themselves as “pro-life.”

Moderate and conservative Republicans accounted for the change; Democrats’ attitudes toward abortion remained constant. “It is possible,” Gallup said in its analysis, that the president “has pushed the public’s understanding of what it means to be ‘pro-choice’ slightly to the left, politically.”

Regarding abortion restrictions, the largest proportion of Americans supports legal abortion only in certain circumstances — as has been true since 1975 — according to Gallup. This year the figure is 53%.

At the ends of the spectrum, the number of people who think abortion should be illegal in all circumstances has risen, to 22%, and the number who think it should be legal in any circumstances has fallen, to 23% — a virtual tie. In the previous few years, people who opposed all restrictions outnumbered advocates of a total ban by a wider margin.

Still, said Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America: “I am pretty confident that Americans really don’t want Roe v. Wade overturned.” The larger number of Americans calling themselves “pro-life,” she said, “doesn’t square with what has happened in the last several elections.” Keenan cited the rejection of abortion bans by voters in politically conservative South Dakota in 2006 and 2008, and the failure of five other antiabortion ballot measures in California, Oregon and Colorado since 2005.

But antiabortion activists think they have more than the new poll on their side. “This isn’t new,” said Charmaine Yoest, president of Americans United for Life. “It tracks pretty much with what we’ve always known: People generally are pro-life depending on how you ask the question.”

The poll comes at a delicate moment for Obama, who campaigned saying abortion should be “safe, legal and rare.”

During his first three months in office, he took a number of steps that infuriated abortion foes. For example, he lifted abortion restrictions on foreign family-planning groups that receive U.S. funding, and he ended President George W. Bush’s ban on embryonic stem cell research.

But Obama has tried at times to appease opponents of abortion rights.

Last month, he backpedaled on a campaign vow to enact the Freedom of Choice Act, which would guarantee the right to legal abortion even if Roe vs. Wade were overturned. He now says the legislation is not a priority.

But Yoest said abortion foes were not placated. “There has been such an avalanche of pro-abortion activity that it’s jaw-dropping. It’s not just that his rhetoric doesn’t square with reality; the gap is Grand Canyon-size. I think this administration has fundamentally miscalculated how out of step they are with the American people.”

Overlooking the Mormon Temple, a New Center

May 13th, 2009

From The New York Times:

SALT LAKE CITY — While the economic crisis has silenced hundreds of real estate projects around the country, 1,100 construction workers are toiling on a 20-acre development here that is springing up across the street from the Mormon Temple in the center of downtown.

A private development of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, City Creek Center will be the largest mixed-use project in Salt Lake City. When completed in 2012, it will encompass 900,000 square feet of retailing, including an outdoor pedestrian shopping mall capped by 115 apartments; 1.6 million square feet of office space in eight buildings; a grocery store; and five residential towers with about 600 condominiums.

The development, which is within sight of the Mormon Tabernacle, will also feature six acres of public spaces and a retractable glass roof over the retail component. A man-made creek will run through the property.

The Mormon Church, which has its headquarters in the city, is investing “hundreds of millions of dollars” in the project, said Mark Gibbons, president of City Creek Reserve Inc., a real estate arm of the church, while declining to be more specific. The project will reshape downtown, Mr. Gibbons said. “We believe there won’t be anything anywhere that compares with it,” he said.

City Creek is not immune to the recession, Mr. Gibbons conceded. But he said the church has always had a “debt averse” philosophy that is proving especially helpful in the current climate.

“For which of you intending to build a tower does not first count the cost to see if he have money to complete, so he doesn’t look like a fool,” said Mr. Gibbons, paraphrasing Luke 14:28-29. “We set aside reserves to build this project, we counted the cost before we started, and we have the resources to complete.”

Bounded by the Great Salt Lake and the Wasatch and Oquirrh mountain ranges, Salt Lake City is home to 200,000 people, about 40 percent of them Mormons. It is a center for outdoor recreation, with several ski areas within 30 minutes of the city; a financial services hub, and a film festival mecca.

But the Mormon Church also wields considerable clout as the city’s largest employer and landowner. “We don’t have a Microsoft or Coca-Cola,” said Jason Mathis, executive director of the Downtown Alliance. “In many ways, the L.D.S. church fills that role.”

Now the church is a bringing a high-density, mixed-use project to Salt Lake City, with its own imprint: outsized, environmentally friendly and with a history of controversy. Two other companies have taken relatively small stakes in parts of the project.

Located at the intersection of the city’s primary commercial and ecclesiastical corridors, Main and South Temple Streets, the City Creek site, which is owned by the church, previously housed two poorly performing malls.

When Nordstrom, which anchored one of the shopping centers, threatened to leave seven years ago, Mormon leaders decided it was time for a makeover. The mayor at the time, Rocky Anderson, called enclosed malls “a failed paradigm,” and the church eventually agreed to a design that is much more open than the former malls.

To integrate the project with the surrounding neighborhood, City Creek planners put all parking underground and carved new streets into Salt Lake City’s monolithic 10-acre blocks — a legacy of the church’s founder, Joseph Smith, who developed a plan for the “City of Zion” in 1833.

The project features sweeping promenades and urban plazas “in line with the great plazas in Italy,” said Joe Collins, a project architect with Zimmer Gunsul Frasca. Fountains that include fire and bells — designed by the company responsible for water features at the Bellagio hotel in Las Vegas — will grace one of the plazas. “It’s going to be marvelous,” Mr. Gibbons said.

City Creek’s two-story 100-store retail center consists of several structures and will be developed by Taubman Centers, a developer based in Michigan, which is investing $75 million.

Its chief operating officer, William S. Taubman, said he had re-signed Macy’s and Nordstrom as anchor tenants, but declined to comment on the number of additional commitments he had secured. The center, which will open in 2012, will provide more upscale shopping than currently found in Salt Lake City, he said.

Nationwide, about 12 other major shopping centers were scheduled to open in the next year, Mr. Taubman said, but almost all of them have been delayed. City Creek is one of the few that has not been hampered by the economic downturn, he said.